“Nowness is our approach. It is a tool to communicate dreams, presenting our goals to the metropolis of Chicago and to the world at large. The College of Architecture at IIT in Chicago provides a platform for questioning the architectural discipline at the dawn of a new age, encouraging childlike curiosities to be explored, and, along the way, reshaping, rewriting, and rethinking metropolises.”
Dean, John and Jeanne Rowe Chair,
IIT College of Architecture
“The contemporary architect must be aware of the myriad forces shaping urban reality. Through his or her professional performance, intellect, and research, he or she navigates and works with these complex forces to direct the shape of the built environment. The time for universal urban models—totalizing utopian visions—may be over, but the need for new strategies for the city is no less acute. In this globalized era characterized by rapid transformations of the built environment, it is critical for architects to develop their consciousness of the complexities of the contemporary world. In order to equip a new generation of architects to develop new strategies, architectural education must strive to produce new and in-depth knowledge of the forces that drive development.”
Associate Professor, Associate Dean of Research,
IIT College of Architecture
Cloud Studios should ideally illustrate the opportunities available to designers, policy makers and civilians to achieve real breakthroughs in a creation of a new habitat. One my ask a question: Is being visionary at odds with being pragmatic? Let us remember that Habitat 67 was a model community and housing complex designed by Moshe Safdie, as his master's thesis in architecture at McGill University. How we can imagine new "Habitat 17", 50 years later. What sort of visionary pragmatism needs to be employed in creation of collective housing projects which afford high residential densities while introducing nonresidential uses. New habitats should introduce urban intensity beyond density, programatic indetermination, integration of public space and cultural events within the urban housing fabric, flexible multiplication of urban uses by increasing social and programatic diversity.
The new collective housing projects could appear as refills of historical districts, reuse of vacant lots, regeneration of harbor areas, regeneration of industrial sites, positive gentrification and re-densification of the central areas and refurbishment of obsolete constructions. In Chicago's urban terminology such projects can appear in South and West loop, along Chicago river industrial sites and waterfront areas.
Rethinking habitat implies debate about urban politics. What kind of political imagination can question mainstream economy and existing political institutional constellations by creating narratives of change and shaping new social relations? Cloud Studios should address mixed used collective housing programs echoing the need to introduce groups of different ages, origins, interests and resources.
Cloud Studios should investigate the use of new technology which can help in development of socially inclusive and environmentally sound urban economies. These economics are based on technologically smart applications and innovations that do add value to the urban environment from which they have evolved. New urban habitats should represent living laboratories designed to test out new forms of habitation, to test bed hubs for technical innovation and communities of practice seeking to try out new ways of growing food and generating energy.
New habitats can appear in "reality" only in a relation to an ever more speculative real estate economy. This economy is characterized with a structural problems in the late capitalist housing market, where focus is on the opportunity to make money, rather than addressing real social needs, demands and desires. What desires and which imaginaries can animate socially inclusive city while promoting urban smartness, efficiency and optimization?
A good city combines living and working. However, this requires a spatial-economic approach that gives production activities a place again in our cities and urbanized regions. Manufacturing is increasingly considered as an answer to the question how to bring back to the city an economy that adds value locally, is circular and socially inclusive.
Finally Cloud Studios should zoom in a domestic sphere of individual, families, and collectives daily lives. What is the capacity of design in relation of addressing different live styles and subcultures?
Cloud Studios are intensive two-semester program structured around two design-based research studios, series of lectures, reviews by invited specialists, fieldwork and exhibitions. Fall semester can address and investigate the issues related to the city of Chicago while Spring semester can concentrate on another metropolitan city with analogous conditions or vise verse. Important should be the critical comparative design exercise with relevant conclusions in terms of performance of new urban housing typologies in different settings.
Studio abroad TU Delft: Maximum City
Winy Maas, Felix Madrazo, Javier Arpa, John Manaves, Adrien Ravon
In the past 10 years, The Why Factory has explored a wide array of approaches to the construction of the city (Biodivercity, Porosity, 3d Nature, 4minCity, Automated City, Vertical Village, Green Dream, Anarcity, Food City, Robotic City, Barbapapa, Egocity, Adaptive City, Absolute Leisure, World Wonders…)
Now, in the academic year 2016/2017, the Graduation Studio Maximum City is an invitation to look at the city through each of those lenses. Students are invited to choose one or some of those topics, or introduce their own agendas, and develop a project for a city based on the maximization of those issues.
Robert Bracken and Jorge Rovira
This studio will focus on repopulating Chicago through transformative design interventions at the scale of the neighborhood. Urban design, architecture and landscape strategies will reposition shrinking communities to capture new residents, opportunities and energy – advancing new living patterns and offering lifestyle alternatives. Competing against conventional suburban and downtown growth models, studio projects must deliver distinctive, inclusive places that challenge the prevailing distribution of community in Chicago.
Sustainable Vertical Urbanism: Towards 2050
Antony Wood and Peng Du
The year is 2050 and, after five decades of attempting to adapt cities to cope with “natural” disasters of increasing frequency and severity in the face of accelerating climate change, humanity has come to accept a simple truth: that the continued viability of our cities is now governed by the inherent sustainability of their location, rather than the increasingly desperate attempt to superimpose more resilient infrastructure on existing urban centers, which typified urban development in the first half of the 21st century. Rapidly rising sea levels, combined with intensifying hurricanes and typhoons, has rendered almost all significant coastal cities across the globe indefensible. Significant flooding and other weather-induced mishaps are an almost monthly occurrence. Earthquakes of increasing regularity and severity, linked to pressure changes on the earth’s crust caused by the melting of polar ice sheets, has rendered cities in seismic zones unviable. Increasing temperatures and solar radiation has made desert-based cities all but indefensible, with the same being true of those in cold climates at the other extreme. In conjunction with all this, cities without proximity to critical natural resources – primarily fresh water and agriculture – are increasingly struggling. Though the truth is disturbing, the reality is generally becoming accepted that most existing cities – even those with many hundreds of years of history – can no longer cope with these conditions. As these cities evolved in a previous period with a different set of priorities and challenges, the social and economic cost of the repair of almost continual ravage and disaster is now too great to justify continuing to sustain them.
The Living Bridge: A study in Lightness
Paul Endres and Susan Conger-Austin
Employing the concept of “lightness” as a strategy, the studio will attempt to use the least amount of material to provide maximum benefit to achieve a new typology for collective housing within an urban setting. This fall, the studio will focus on the potential of a material – wood – and in particular, bamboo, to discover how “the invention of form coincides with the invention of the building process.”
Students will consider the creation of a living landform, one that is built over time and is sustainable as the metropolis matures. This semester, the potential of living on and within a bridge will be investigated. The site is Miami, Florida.
Making Metropolis 7/8
We compose naturally through our bodies, using all our senses. We apprehend ourselves and our surroundings physically well before we do intellectually. Thus, it is of fundamental interest that Embodiment and the Senses have emerged as the focus of recent, dramatic breakthroughs in the human sciences. They concern the way we perceive, respond to and understand the world through primal biological operations. This studio explores the meaning and implications of these sensibilities to make a distinct Metropolitan Place: an active, evolving Place of diversity and freedom within a distinct framework - bodies within a grid and nature - integrating practice with a coherent theoretical strategy.
This studio will develop the same building program in two major American cities - Chicago and Los Angeles - over two academic terms. In the Fall Term the focus will be on Wabash Avenue in the Chicago Loop. In the Spring it will be on Sunset Boulevard at the foot of the Hollywood Hills in Los Angeles. In both terms students will design 750,000 SF of mixed-use within a housing format.
Beijing Olympics 2022
Martin Felsen and Ron Henderson
The studio will design Olympic venues, including legacy housing and urban villages, for the 2022 Beijing Winter Games amidst a post-industrial district. The Olympic Games have established a modern legacy of imprinting singular, symbolic and lasting physical impressions upon their host cities. The studio will focus on designing clustered, multi-layered, cross-programmed urban organizations for the 2022 Beijing Olympics emphasizing the interaction between water, landscape, building, function, program, sports and lifestyle.
MCHAP emerge: Being the Mountain
The city works as an agent of change of different urban and social conditions. Searching for new models to understand, developing and solving city problems while rethinking individual and collective metropolitan experiences, the studio explores the relationship between topography and architecture through the design of a housing program with mixed use additional programs on a steep site.
Rethinking habitat implies debate about urban politics, new social relationships, programs, new forms of habitation among other things. The Studio encourages students to achieve real breakthroughs in the creation of a new habitat.
MCHAP emerge: Naïve Intention: Vanishing Point
Pezo von Ellrichshausen
Vanishing Point: a study on perspective through large libraries in Land of Fire; an extreme inhabitation within the repository of knowledge.
In our studio we will develop a protocity that deals with an interiorized urban context hosting a mix of inhabiting infrastructure and common spaces: housing, hotels, motels, shared in-habiting infrastructure, short term inhabiting support, conventional housing, public facilities. The hotel type unfolds from a highly constrained set of efficiencies and introduces interiorized landscapes and urbanscapes. The traditional list of hotel types, Downtown Hotels, Suburban Hotels and Motels, Resorts, Convention Hotels, Conference Centers, Residential and Condomininum Hotels, Suite Hotels, Super-Luxury Hotels, Mega Hotels, Mixed-Use Hotels, Casi-no Hotels , will be analyzed and complemented with other modes of inhabitation that expand its performance both in shorter term modes of stability and towards more stable forms of community. This new city will be developed as a prototype that responds to a double condition of evaluation: on one hand it will need to declare its efficiencies and limitations, and on the other, it will need to unfold an urban collective landscape that supports the cultural complexity of the new society.
Towards Self Powered Building Environment
The Cloud Studio briefs could address the cities as incubators of different conditions. In the search for new models for densifying cities and as the response to the problem of large-scale developments, Hybrid Building typology should be explored. This type was developed to optimize the use of land and simultaneously envisioned as a social condenser. Therefore, it is capable to fulfill social demands for living, working, recreating and efficiency of means. Chicago continues to be our laboratory for investigation, a place of two seminal hybrid typologies Marina City Complex and Hancock Tower.
This intensive two-semester program is structured around two design-based research studios. Series of lectures, reviews by invited specialists, fieldwork and exhibitions complements the curriculum. Fall semester can address and investigate the issues related to the city of Chicago while Spring semester can concentrate on another metropolitan city with analogous conditions or vice versa. Important should be the critical comparative design exercise with relevant conclusions in terms of performance of new hybrid housing urban typologies in different settings.
M. Nagis and R. Bracken (SOM) - Station Mutation
Despite much uncertainty, high speed rail in the United States is forging ahead with a unique speculative burden. Both public and private sector initiatives have emerged, competing to demonstrate the value HSR can bring to their regions. These projects are not simply creating rail corridors, but leveraging the adjacent social and economic impact of rail investment towards new transformative design opportunities.
A High Speed Rail network in the Great Lakes Region would connect the economic hubs of Chicago and Toronto, putting 50 million people within 3 hours of each other. 80% of Midwesterners live within 25 miles of a railroad.This studio will reconsider collateral development opportunities (hybrids, dualisms, mixed-use, TOD) integrated with urban mobility - particularly focusing on the stations, terminals and intermodal hubs of a regional high speed rail network.
Jennifer Park - Image of Sharing
It’s not new or “now” to want to create more density in our city centers. There are many sustainable benefits to our built environment that we do not need to question. However, how we create more density remains open for debate.
The problem of density and urban development is framed by a simple dichotomy. One side consists of the politically charged modernist approach to cities which resulted in ideas as dismissive as Corb’s tabula rasa or as destructive as Haussmann or as dominating as Superstudio. On the other side of the debate we find apolitical generations of informal cities where development adopted no formally specific language other than to adapt to the current conditions.
Between these endpoints is a conversation, political and apolitical, global and local, which acknowledges a culture of “sharing.” By sharing, we are dense, diverse and sustainable. And to share does not diminish our control as individuals, but uses the collective to empower the individual.
While looking to shared models as catalysts to create density, the shared economy also promotes diversity and sustainability. There are other opportunities to change the spaces of our cities. If Lyft usurps all taxi companies, do our personal parking spaces also need to have car washing, maintenance, repair, advertising? If crowd funding site like Kickstarter replaces private developers, do we replace box-like towers with a more diverse skyline? If we share more spaces, does the quality of construction become more desirable and necessary? Is there a return to craft and departure from the fast-track tilt up?
The shared economy promises density, diversity and sustainability for the development and growth of our cities.
Martin Felsen - Sponge City Superblocks
Students will learn to design a “Sponge City” where soft, green infrastructure collects rainfall in order to store drinking water and control flooding. And, each student will design a Superblock for a low carbon SpongeCity that is mixed-use, thoughtfully-dense, people-oriented, and ecologically-responsive for Changde, China (fall semester) and Chicago, US (spring semester).
Monika Thadhani and Chris Groesbeck - Urban Paradox
The “Urban Paradox” studio focuses on the relationship between “Urbanization” and “Urbanism”. It will study the convergence of technological, economic, cultural and environmental issues critical for the health of the metropolis today and the future. It will also address an approach of inclusivity that is non-existent in development today, but critical to the health and resilience of the metropolis of the future.
Dirk Denison - Re-populating a Frontier Metropolis - Detroit (FALL 2015 Semester ONLY)
Since exiting bankruptcy in Detroit, a number of private citizens have taken it into their own hands to rebuild the city. The most visible, Dan Gilbert, has actively purchased millions of square feet of real estate, much in Detroit’s historic buildings. An entrepreneur and a catalyst for Detroit’s revitalization Dan Gilbert’s group Bed Rock Real Estate Services is holding a competition amongst the three Colleges of Architecture closest to Detroit, and have asked IIT to be among them to re-envision hybrid housing for the future of urban dwelling.
The competition is a proposal for a new Hybrid Housing Typology that could be used as a prototype for implementation as Detroit repopulates. This new typology will illustrate how urban housing is conceived in the future through the exploration of concepts like of co-habitation, sharing cultures, innovative construction techniques, and disruptive technologies. This new Hybrid Housing Typology will engage with itself as it is repeated to rebuild neighborhood and will become its own surrounding context.
Susan Conger-Austin and Paul Endres - MCHAP Herzog & de Meuron Residency Miami with Dirk Denison and Jason Frantzen - Porous Boundaries Miami
Miami is referred to as the Capital of the Americas – The hub for all of Latin America, North America and the Caribbean to come together through leisure, commerce, finance, ports, cruise ships, air transit, and above all, a unified goal to fulfill the “Miami” American Dream of excess, luxury and comfort.
The studio will create Hybrid Housing based proposals engaging both culture and infrastructure that will spark dialog on growth and the sustainable development of Miami.
Pezo von Ellrichshausen - Naive Intention 04: Capricious Field
The studio is based on a sequence of precise but seemingly arbitrary instructions, what we call simulated problems or constraints. By following these given facts, each student is asked to make personal (and common) sense to those initial parameters. The resulting formal structures should be based on deduction and logic. Each individual proposal must be developed from its location to the details of construction and inhabitation, from the presence of the object in the landscape to the everyday elements such us chairs or doors. Due to this wide process, students are expected to produce simple but clear ideas. We assume that the normality of life always enhances the complexity of the most basic architectonic entities.
Steven Brubaker - Making Metropolis 5 / 6
Two very different major American cities, Chicago and Los Angeles, with two very different key streets, Wells and Grand, will be researched and developed with dense, mixed-use projects: on Wells in Chicago during the Fall term and on Grand in Los Angeles during the Spring term.
Wells from Lake to Jackson is the western leg of Chicago’s fabled Loop. Underutilized parcels straddling Wells will be the sites for large complex projects to explore “streets on the ground” and “streets in the air.”
Grand in Bunker Hill is now the culture center of Los Angeles. Infamous Parcel Q across from Disney Hall, still undeveloped, will be the site to explore how a single, major, mixed-use project can unify a district by generating an entirely new “spirit of place.”
Lluis Ortega - Interior Bestiary
Our research will posit the digital realm as a change in direction that is shaping a particular state of mind and sensibility, where cybernetics are reappearing to provide the tools, the terminology and the condition of an artifice to intuitions that might appear, naturalizing the sensible. We will explore historic disciplinary material to abstract operative diagrams of the creation of voids; we will design our protocols for the assemblage of second-order systems, and we will experiment by carving existing large structures in order to introduce new notions of urban interiority. The notion of urban interior will be approached as an alternative to collage cities and the accumulation of programs by designing voids that exhaust the differentiation of specific categories.
Winy Maas, John Manaves (Studio Abroad TU Delft) - WeGo City
The next Why Factory studio will take place (again) in The Netherlands. This country has a great tradition of collective housing examples. The studio will expand on this and develop the next step in general housing. (W)eGo City investigates and push forward the limits of design freedom by making for each user its dream house under dense circumstances that share a collective infrastructure. There are so many housing possibilities in terms of outer envelope, but the current production of towers and slabs reduces the variety into extrusions of the same floor plans. How to improve this?
Peter Land - Universal Space
Our design objective is to develop proposals for experimental buildings and structures which are shaped to accelerate wind flow to drive turbine rotors to generate electrical energy for users of a building.
The studio will begin with a research phase of about three weeks to study and document international built and theoretical examples of building structures and ideas before beginning any design work. I will work closely with each student on the design development work.
Emphasis will be placed on sustainability and natural systems, and elegant structures. This semester will work on high-rise structures. Students should have good modeling skills including Rhino and be enthusiastic about technology for information and technology for inspiration! As with much research based design work, buildings are shaped as the projects evolve and concepts emerge.
2014-2015 CLOUD Studios, Professors and Themes:
New offerings in the Cloud Studios this year include a studio lead by architects of VOA and three studios in collaboration with SOM among several other exciting prospects.
Zoka Zola and Dorothea Schulz – New City
This studio will continue and expand on last year’s research on how new technologies and scientific discoveries can be the basis for future cities. This studio looks at an inter-disciplinary approach, at researching and imagining how new technologies and scientific discoveries can be brought to the urban devel-opment, resulting in a futuristic city based on technological advancement of architecture. By allowing the concept of future to enter the design approach, we are free to circumvent the problems and go directly to solutions that otherwise would seem impossible.
Steven Brubaker – Making Metropolis 3
Immediately west of the Chicago Loop are three under-utilized parallel poetries of place: Wacker Drive, the River and the Railroads from Lake to Willis. Can Randolph, Washington, Madison, Monroe, Adams and Jackson lace them together into the dense, mixed-use Metropolis they want to be: Walking, Water and Air Rights, layered horizontally and vertically: silent, secret, fecund figura serpentinatas on the Chicago Grid?
The first term, student teams of three will master plan these parallel places employing a mixed-use program of large-scale residential, educational, entertainment, ofﬁce, manufacturing and cultural complexes embedded within gardens, street-retail and street-scape. The second term the same teams will comprehensively design one complex each.
Susan Conger-Austin – Setting the stage
This is a unique opportunity for students to propose the making of a modest public space through the practices of people and critical architectural interventions in the urban environment. The space should capture a mix of specificity, ie the local culture and desired current needs, while allowing for future reinvention and fluidity of program. What is the meaning of the local in the context of globalization and digital networks? Can a local space have a larger span than its physical boundaries? Can a public building in a specific neighborhood act as a catalyst for multi- sited events throughout a city?
As architects, we learn from many forms of knowledge: We research the past, searching for patterns, organization, and attitude toward site, observing any alterations to the original type that might reveal evolving needs. Then, through discussions with educators, students and administrators we learn about current desires and needs. Combining both past and present knowledge, the collaborative dialogue and debate begins.
In the Fall Semester, students will work closely with two public high schools, along with Goodman Theater, and faculty within IIT’s Department of Math And Science Education to help develop the curriculum/connections between the arts, sciences and the humanities using the urban environment as the vehicle. In particular, students (working in groups) will identify specific areas within each school’s neighborhood where a series of interactive spaces can encourage this new curriculum both with the school and its community. Students will research, analyze and document the proposed sites, and will develop a master plan by the end of the fall semester. Each proposal will include a performance space to embody the educational aims of the
newly created curriculum.
Martin Felsen – In the Zone
Students will design architecture, landscapes and infrastructure serving water-intensive industries and institutions within a newly conceptualized “Water Enterprise Trade Zone” (WET Zone) in Chicago.
Combining the Rust Belts’ expected population growth with its abundance of freshwater, the studio will develop a design strategy for the re-densification of underutilized post-industrial landscapes in Chicago. Recycled freshwater will be used as a catalyst for attracting water-intensive industries to relocate from areas such as the Sun Belt - where water is scarce - to the water endowed Great Lakes region. Today, water intensive businesses representing millions of jobs are scrambling to secure long-term water resources as global supplies become more and more contested. To this end, the studio will speculate on the creation an Enterprise Zone named the “Water Enterprise Trade Zone” (WET Zone) surrounding the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District's (MWRD) Calumet treatment plant at 130th Street in Chicago.
Chris Groesbeck, Monika Thadhani (VOA) – Reforesting the City
This studio will focus on the evolutionary nature of urban growth in response to new programs, changes of context and upcoming epoch of future urbanism. Studio will attempt to project future models within the context of the historical city. It will elaborate study of new possibilities of urban form, physical and sociological configuration with consideration of the past, and focus towards the future. It will study the opportunities to redefine and improve urban livability with its integrated city infrastructure. It will implement the possibility of evolving city structure and technology to better use the ecological systems, introduce the opportunity to reduce the carbon level with growing city densification. The studio will provide a platform to investigate and question today's cities, will discuss designs that merge architecture with environment, demonstrate a novel method of arranging city spaces with idea of harmoniously integrated Earth’s biological life forms with the spaces of human activities. The studio initiative will merge architecture studio with student’s attitude towards reality thru their personal experience expressed in various forms of art.
As a response to the issue above this studio will propose the idea of “Reforesting City” as both an Ecological Methodology and a Metaphor for future urban development that will look at concerns of high density, study the interconnection between systems of open spaces and creating new imperative hybrids that transform the historical concept into the future urban model.
Cloud/SOM collaborative studio: Martin Kläschen– Interrogating Density
Based on a systematic research approach, the studio will study the phenomenon of density with focus on social-urban problems such as segregation, mono zoning, getthoization, migration, demography, living patterns, subcultures, shared spaces, public versus private, diversity etc and investigate their impact on the quality of our urban environment. Following up on these problematic occurrences studio participants will explore means for increasing social-urban interfaces, fostering ethnic and cultural diversity as well as stabilizing the urban economy and introducing a major shift toward using sustainable resources. In order to rethink social-urban conventions of density the studio will pursue the idea of fatness.
Cloud/SOM collaborative studio: Andrew Schachman – Chicago Winter Active
In Summer, Chicago’s spaces expand horizontally, adjacent, and within. As climate permeates all scales it reawakens forgotten realms: the summer cottage revives as a complement to the flat, the lake cools activities at the city’s edge, the horizon expands as a buoyant social plane. In Winter, the space of the city retracts. Our regional cosmology shifts, from hinterland to yard. Buildings assume a defensive posture, insulated and pressurized. This opening and closing of the metropolis seems more a product of Chicago’s attitude toward organization than a necessary response to climate.. Can we rethink our mental map of Chicago to activate civic life in Winter? Can we reconsider snow, rain, cold, heat, and humidity, as natural resources rather than inconveniences or constraints? Can we enrich our response to issues like climate change with new social, aesthetic, and economic agendas? Students will research and develop approaches to these questions proposing new landscapes, infrastructures, housing, institutions, installations, or technical assemblies.
Cloud/SOM collaborative studio: SOM team: Robert Bracken and Arathi Gowda - Mobility
This studio will be challenged to find viable design solutions at the intersection of Density + Transit and their resultant impact on the performance of the city. Transportation infrastructure has clear spatial implications for the city, and intangible but significant impacts on the energy, economic and demographic systems that support it.
By focusing on mobility, this studio will build bridges between the system based thinking required to optimize connectivity and the spatial/architectural manifestation of those solutions within the built environment. Using Chicago as a laboratory, this studio will seek to align our design thinking with this new political charge for the city, exploring innovative mobility solutions and demonstrating their value beyond moving people.
Study Abroad: Winy Maas, Ulf Hackau, Bryant Pitak – Farm Blocks - Urban farming beyond clichés
Food, next to energy and water, is one of the key resources driving our cities. The way we produce, distribute, consume and discard food plays a crucial role in how our cities pre- pare for the future. Business as usual is not enough. Today’s global food system has to improve. This requires not only technological innovation but also spatial integration. There is certainly a role for architects and planners to work on this integration, to enable synergies by connecting food in a better way to the other flows of the city. Is our profession prepared to give an effective contribution to the necessary changes of the global food system? The interest is undeniably there. Food related design proposals have popped up in architecture schools all over the globe. There is a photoshopped abundance of green rooftops, happy cows and lucky farmers. But all too often, these images are too uninformed, too small, too romantic and far too far away from the tight realities of food production. We need to get serious in our proposals, realistic in the surfaces and precise in the requirements of food production.
In this studio, we take the challenge.
Thomas Kearns – Somewhere, Somethings: The Space Problem
In the studio, we will study and practice methodologies previously borrowed from and created by the Situationists, whose efforts to provide agency and engagement often relied on play and games. We will engage directly, through fieldwork in the city, on the city. The studio should be considered a design-build studio, whereby its participants will directly engage and construct interventions using physical and computational building systems. We will build our own Internet of Things, and deploy it within the fabric of the city, so as to literally test the design and theories of our research. We will not simply re-think the Metropolis, we will actively reconstuct the Metropolis.
The studio will be organized into two phases outlined in more detail below. The first phase will be a carefully choreographed series of workshops driving skill building, applied technology research, and issue based urban research. The second phase will operate as small group projects, providing interest driven application of the students newly acquired skillsets and preparation for the spring semester.
Marshall Brown – American Dreams: Super Blocks, Broad Acres and Local Codes
This studio will deal with problems of urban form in the contemporary American context. Put simply, we will directly confront the continuing failures of urban design and architecture to provide compelling and desirable spatial models for our democratic, free-market society. Chicago, like many American cities, has experienced extremely uneven development over the past decades. Increasing mobility, market forces, social, and political problems have all contributed to the increasingly rapid and unmanageable spread of populations around the metropolitan area.
MCHAP Emerging Winner: Pezo von Ellrichshausen – Naïve Intention
Naïve Intention is a sequence of studios that explore the necessary spaces for nostalgia, meaning, uselessness and fiction within the urban collective experiences. The central aim of our exploration is not so much to focus on the specific phenomena and their causes but in their potential to be translated into a work of architecture, this is: a synthetic (even ascetic) object, a unitary and self-centred structure that basically refers to itself. The series of studios will explore the distant cultural landscape of the Chilean territory. The research will be alternated with studio trip to various locations, from the Atacama Desert or the Andes Mountains, to Chiloe Island, Patagonia and the southern Land of Fire archipelago. Each studio will focus on a different climatic and material condition under preliminary list of subjects.
Cloud Studios Curator: Vedran Mimica
Cloud Studios Coordinator: Agata Siemionow